|
Bob Ciaffone
Feb. 26, 2001
|
Tournament Psychology
Common psychological errors made in tournament play
Many poker players perform well below their technical ability when playing in a
tournament. More money and more prestige are at stake in a large tournament than
in all but the biggest money games. This leads to more pressure.
Speaking
for myself, I have played a tournament pot with a seven-figure amount in it, and
a great many in six figures. But in money games, only perhaps a dozen
pots I've played have been as much as five figures. I am sure that most of you
also have greatly disparate sums in these two departments.
Read the rest of this Article
|
|
Bob Ciaffone
Apr. 13, 2001
|
Psychology of Tournament Play
Playing in a poker tournament has some clear differences in psychology from the
typical money game setting. I think it is profitable to talk about those
differences, both to avoid certain pitfalls yourself and take advantage of
weaknesses in others. The importance of the mental side of tournament play is
not to be discounted.
When I enter a poker tournament, I am there for the money. I do not care how
long I last. I do not care how many or how few scalps I collect. In my opinion,
any attitude other than being there for the money is a hindrance to doing your
best. There are lots of reasons to play in a poker tournament, but only one is
valid: to get the money.
Read the rest of this Article
|
|
Matt Lessinger
Oct. 22, 2004
|
Playing the Percentages:
No-Limit Hold'em Tournament Advice?
Televised poker usually shows the percentage chance of winning next to each
hand. When people see those percentages, they are often surprised that the
"underdog" hand has a better chance of winning than they thought. That
information can have a large impact on your playing strategies. My last column
dealt with no-limit hold'em cash games, so today I will address No-limit Hold'em
tournaments, with three things I suggest you don't do.
Read the rest of this Article
|
|
Mike Sexton
Feb. 11, 2005
|
Tournament Tips
Tournament poker has taken the country by storm. Tournaments are fun,
exciting, and challenging, and they enable us to fulfill our competitive
instincts. The multimillion-dollar prize pools we see weekly on the World
Poker Tour are attractive to the players who enter and the TV viewers.
Whether you're an amateur or a professional, if you're at all serious about
poker, chances are that you want to be at the final table of a WPT event,
with a chance to compete for millions of dollars and prove your mettle as a
player.
Read the rest of this Article
|
|
Andrew N.S. Glazer
May 12, 2004
|
Three Big Mistakes Made by Tournament Novices
Thanks in no small part to what television has meant for poker in the last
year, tournaments have never been as popular as they are now. The prize pools
have grown so large that even many good money players who used to shun
tournaments, fearing that their profitable anonymity might vanish, have decided
the money is too big to ignore, and the ancillary benefits - matters such as
endorsements - are now potentially huge.
Read the rest of this Article
|
|
Brandon Adams
Sept 2006
|
Tournament Tactics
When I first started playing tournament poker, I tended to bust near the
bubble. I would play very tight in the early stages, and then as the blinds and antes
rose, I’d wait for good hands and push in. This frequently resulted in me
busting with good but not great hands, such as A-Jo or T-T.
Busting with a hand like a pair of tens near the bubble is, in some ways, a
respectable thing to do. When your friends ask you how you busted, you can say,
“I was short-stacked and I reraised all in for twelve big blinds with a pair of
tens,” and they will say, “Oh, well. You had to push there.” They’d be right,
and in my early days I’d take some consolation in their assurances that my
bustout was unavoidable. But after a while, I started to ask myself, “Why’d I
only have twelve big blinds at that point?”
Read the rest of this Article
|
|
Brett ‘gank’ Jungblut
Oct 07, 2008
|
The Art of Misinformation
As simple as the rules may be in poker, the game itself is amazingly complex. Most of its complexity is a result of the fact that it is a game of imperfect information – although you know your opponents actions, you do not know what his actual hole cards are. Things become even more intricate as players apply psychology. Poker’s basis on imperfect information is what separates it from other games such as chess and even backgammon, because
in those games both opponents have the same information and decisions are much less about the psychology of the game than they are about the strategy and math aspects. Since we can’t see our opponent’s hole cards, we as players are constantly looking for reads and tells from our opponents as to what they might be holding in a particular hand. Based on our previous experiences with the player and their actions during the hand, we attempt to determine their hand “range”, or what possible hands they could be holding.
For poker’s top players, an opponent’s perceived range is constantly changing based on the information they gather. At the same time, these players try to manipulate their opponents into thinking that their own range is much bigger or smaller than it actually is, depending on the current situation. These players try to sell a story with their betting amounts, physical actions, and overall demeanor in an attempt to trick their opponents into making wrong assumptions, which, in turn, leads to more errors by their
opponents.
Read the rest of this Article
|
|
Tom McEvoy
May 03, 2005
|
Betting the Wrong Amount in No-Limit Hold'em Tournaments
Lots of tournament players play their "A" games for an hour or so - until
they can't stand it any longer. "There are a lot of players in tournaments who
don't have an 'A' game," T.J. Cloutier stated. "In the long run, the weaker
players are going to make calls and plays that are so far out of line that they
don't have a chance to win the tournament." In simple terms, the player who
makes the fewest mistakes in no-limit Texas hold'em is the one who makes the
most money.
Read the rest of this Article
|

 

Copyright © 2004-2010 Michels Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Webmaster: Dan@AMichels.NET
|